GREAT Advanced Course strengthens gender research skills for resilient agricultural systems

Participants received advanced training as part of the Level 2 course for fellows
from sub-Saharan Africa.

The Advanced GREAT Course for Sub-Saharan Africa

Held virtually over 13 days from Oct. 18 to Nov. 4, the course provided advanced training for fellows who took the GREAT courses during Phase 1. These 32 participants (14 men, 16 women) were biophysical and social scientists from 11 agricultural research institutions in sub-Saharan Africa, and 19 trainers drawn from Makerere University, Cornell University, CGIAR, National Agricultural Research Organization and independent consultants.

The course included two phases. Part 1 targeted both biophysical and social scientists, while part 2 targeted social scientists to enable participants to conceptualise, design and implement rigorous/high quality gender research and transformative development projects.

According to Margaret Mangheni, GREAT Co-Principal Investigator and professor at Makerere, the Advanced Course deepened skills and theory in gender-responsive agricultural research to contribute to resilient food and agricultural systems.

“We continue to aspire to link gender and practice along the agricultural research cycle. Crop breeding remains the niche, but in this phase, we expanded it to include seed systems and resilient agricultural systems. We also continue to engage in the Community of Practice, and we’ll take it beyond from sub-Saharan Africa to other geographies including South Asia,” Mangheni said.

Hale Ann Tufan, GREAT Co-PI and research professor at Cornell University, explained the roadmap of the course.

“We laid the groundwork foundation in Level 1, and we are now moving away from gender awareness to transformation. With the intention to change gender practice, we are looking at transforming teams and disciplines, we enhance advocacy, communications, Monitoring, learning and evaluation, and the research process. We hope functioning of interdisciplinary teams is improved, you will be able to operationalize gender data in breeding; seed systems and resilience, apply feminist and gender-transformative approaches to research,” Tufan said.

Course content

Content delivered in Part 1 included key aspects of disciplinary interface: transcending misconceptions, biases and assumptions; communication and advocacy; gender data in breeding; market segmentation; product profiling; seed systems & resilience; and tracking and measuring gender integration and transformation. In Part 2, participants learned about conceptualization and design of gender research for agriculture, and concepts, design and measurement frameworks for Gender Transformative Approaches (GTA) in agricultural research and development.

Participant perceptions

Throughout the course, participants shared key learnings and take-aways from the course. They said they were energized to carry on the learnings to practice to build resilient agricultural systems.

For Stephen Angudubo, a Research Analysis, Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning specialist, at Uganda’s National Crop Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI), feminist approaches and theories were new to him, but with the training, he will be able to integrate them in his research. “I used to wonder whether there were frameworks to measure different gender transformative approaches. I learnt about the GALS approach which even measures community empowerment including individuals to take control of their lives,” Angudubo said.

Quotes from participants

• “I have strengthened my learning on interdisciplinary research. The biophysical scientists try to solve some problems, but the social scientists give in-depth understanding of the problems…The do no harm model from G+ makes the breeders work easy because there are questions and you can see if your product design is doing harm, or has a positive effect.” – Negussie Zenna, a breeder at the Africa Rice research Institute
• “Excellent experience in the last 9 days! Absolutely renewing….. Feeling out of my traditional comfort zone.” – Williams Esuma, a breeder at National Agricultural Research Organization
• “I now have an idea on… who do you want to train, when, and how to  package the message. Before, after conducting Participatory Varietal Selection, we just note there were so many men and so many women, but from this training, I know we need to go deeper and get more information about the different farmers so that you know which problem may cause the poor performance from each of the categories.” Shylet Tsekenedza, a breeder at the Crop Breeding Institute in Zimbabwe
• “I will share all the learnings and this new experience with my colleagues  because I believe gender is a topic that everyone on the team should know.” Dorah Mwenye from Zambia.